Consumer Complaint Detail

CHEVROLET / LUMINA / 1999

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 0000084611 Incident Date: Jan, 01 1970
Consumer's City: COLDWATER Consumer's State: MI
Vehicle Transmission Type: Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC
Model Name: LUMINA Model Year: 1999
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: Yes Component's Description: Vehicle speed control
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 2G1WL52M8X9 Date added to File: May, 23 2021
Date Complaint Received: Jun, 02 1999 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: Yes Purchase Date: Oct, 31 1998
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 0 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: This is a leased car i have had since november 1998. i drive with an accelerator adapter that allows me to use my left foot. this is the third car in which i have used such an adapter and have never had any problems. neither did i have trouble with this car until may 1999. in may i had three incidents of sudden and unexpected accleration while slowly backing out of a driveway or a parking space in a lot. with each incident it was increasingly more difficult to stop. the first time firm pressure on the brake finally stopped it and i could shift into drive and stop. in the second the car finally stalled out after bucking and roaring as i literally stood on the brake while pulling on the steering wheel for more pressure. this was after backing almost the length of a 200 foot driveway which ends in a busy street. in the third incident the car finally stopped after ramming a van and moving its back end 2 feet from where it was parked and bouncing off a second van after which my car spun around full circle and finally stalled out. after the first incident i had checked the adapter and everything was ok. i intended to take the car in for service the following week and thought i'd tell them what happened at that time. but the second incident happened the following saturday and the third the tuesday after that. i was told by the shop that fixed the car that there is nothing wrong with it but they did not get a gm engineer to check it as my insurance company suggested. harold chevrolet now has the car and are trying to replicate the problem. i do not want the car back and i want to get out of the lease before the car kills someone. not only was the result worse each time this happened but the time between decreased with each incident. *ak