Consumer Complaint Detail

HONDA / ACCORD / 1990

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 000044454 Incident Date: May, 16 2000
Consumer's City: HEMPSTEAD Consumer's State: TX
Vehicle Transmission Type: Manufacturers Name: Honda (American Honda Motor Co.)
Model Name: ACCORD Model Year: 1990
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Tires:tread/belt
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Aug, 09 2000 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: -
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: No
Number of Cylinders: 0 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: Two replacement falken tires were purchased at willowbrook-ntb#7291[houston,tx] on july 7, 1998 and placed on the rear wheels. the odometer reading was 143,000 miles. the first of the two blow-outs occurred on may 17, 2000 traveling at 70mph. as the blow-out proceeded, the vehicle shook violently and was difficult to control. the tire showed no signs of a cut or puncture; but rather had come apart, leaving layers and strips of the rubber with frayed steel wires sticking out. a tire "adjustment" was reluctantly given[i had purchased road hazard protection on both of the tires.] by the nearest ntb dealer who measured the tread [which showed no abnormal wear signs] to determine the adjustment. i told him i believed it to be a defective tire, since it was different from any "blow-out" i had ever experienced. the second "blow-out" occurred on july 3, 2000 while traveling at 60mph. again the car shook violently but this time i recognized what was happening and had a somewhat easier time bringing the car to a controlled stop. the odometer reading was 181,143 miles. the second tire had the same appearance as the first, but more of it remained intact because i was able to pull over and roll to a stop more quickly. on both days the temperatures were between 98 and 101*f. the first tire had 35,291 miles of wear and the second had 38,143 miles of wear according to my calculations. i told the ntb sales technician that i was positive that both tires were defective and someone was going to be killed if they remained in use. i asked him how to report my suspicions. he offered nothing of help but argued that the tires were not defective. *ak( dot number: v4cbf04347 tire size: 195/60hr15 )