| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 001063819 | Incident Date: Jan, 16 2001 |
| Consumer's City: MILWAUKEE | Consumer's State: WI |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: | Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC |
| Model Name: PRIZM | Model Year: 1995 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Seat belts:front:anchorage |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: 1Y1SK5280SZ | Date added to File: May, 16 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Jan, 21 2001 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Sep, 30 1995 |
| Was Original Owner: Yes | Anti-lock Brakes: No |
| Number of Cylinders: 0 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: Both seat belts in my car are considered defective by my dealer. gm agreed to pay for the new seat belts after i argued for an hour with a representative on the phone and then went down to the dealership to argue with the service manager. to replace two seat belts in a 95 geo prism the cost is upwards of $650. the customer service representative from gm actualy siad that i had broke them from "over-usage". i wonder why if it is a law that people wear a seat belt while opperating a car, why it is not a law that the car manufacturers guarantee their seat belts for the life of the car? my seat belts were replace for free in part because i am aggressive, mouthy, and i out-wit both the customer service rep and the service manager at hall chevrolet. how many people have actualy paid to get their defective seat belts fixed?*ak |
