Consumer Complaint Detail

TOYOTA / PREVIA / 1992

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 001075314 Incident Date: Jul, 14 2001
Consumer's City: MUSKEGON Consumer's State: MI
Vehicle Transmission Type: Manufacturers Name: Toyota Motor Corporation
Model Name: PREVIA Model Year: 1992
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Parking brake:conventional
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: JT3AC22S9N1 Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Jul, 16 2001 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: Nov, 30 1991
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: No
Number of Cylinders: 0 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: On 7/15/2001 i drove my wife's previa and noticed that it seemed to have an unusual amount of drag while gliding while in "drive" as if the brakes were somehow on, although neither the main brakes nor the parking brake were on. one day later, my toyota dealer tells me that it was a "sticking parking brake" and that it would cost $490 (!!) to fix. a few calls to other mi toyota dealerships confirmed that it's not an unusual problem at all. since the parking brake drum and shoe unit is separate from the rear disc brake rotors, but still enclosed from the weather, i have no idea as to why this would be such a common problem. the cost of $490 is about what a full dealer done brake job would cost if none of the rotors had to be replaced. it seems to me, and many other car owners were they asked, that brakes can wear out but for the environment to cause terminal deterioration in such an important system is beyond comprehension. a high volume dealership service manager told me that they don't ever allow their mechanics to touch the parking brakes because "of the common occurrence of having those brakes seize up." how's that for reliability? (or is it plain liability?) plaese notify me if any others have reported this problem or if they have merely passively coughed uo the $500 bucks and 'gotten on with it.*ak