| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 002030524 | Incident Date: Nov, 04 2002 |
| Consumer's City: CROWLEY | Consumer's State: TX |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: Mazda North American Operations |
| Model Name: HOOD | Model Year: 9999 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Power train:automatic transmission |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: | Date added to File: May, 23 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Jul, 25 2005 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: - |
| Was Original Owner: No | Anti-lock Brakes: No |
| Number of Cylinders: 4 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: 1)new car purchase aug 1997 - 5 miles;2)transmission replacement feb 1999~38,000 miles;3)transmission replacement dec 1999~57000 miles;4)informed at 130k miles that i needed another transmission ( with each transmission clearly having less than an average of 60,000 miles on it. in each case my o/d light flashed on the dashboard, immediately sending a signal to turn on the check engine light. i sent formal complaints to mazda, the dealership and since have sent complaints to the attorney general's office. i have learned of tsb # 0500502 (which you do not show on your site). yesterday (07/25/2005) i learned that there have been several consumer complaints and today i learned of nhtsa. since there are no set number of complaints needed before a recall is issued and considering the severity of this issue, why was a recall not issued? i sent a complaint letter to town north mazda (dealership where i purchased my vehicle) while looking for transmission repair facilities, i ran across this article and am out done by the blatant disloyalty and failure on the part of mazda/ford motors to stand behind its products via recall or some other means. http://www.estreetjournal.com/mazda.htm |
