Consumer Complaint Detail

CHRYSLER / SEBRING CONVERTIBLE / 1997

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 002102237 Incident Date: Oct, 27 2002
Consumer's City: SAN MATEO Consumer's State: CA
Vehicle Transmission Type: Manufacturers Name: Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)
Model Name: SEBRING CONVERTIBLE Model Year: 1997
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Steering:rack and pinion
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 3C3EL55H1VT Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Nov, 06 2002 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: May, 31 2097
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 0 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: Driving at approx. 15 mph the steering system failed/locked on my car. the car was towed to the dealer on 10/28/02, and was initially diagnosed a "failure of the power steering pump". the dealer replaced the pump, and during the mechanic testing found that the newly replaced pump also immediately failed and steering again locked. the dealer then diagnosed the problem as being a total failure of the "rack" which needed replacement as it had "failed and was contaminating the pumps". both the power steering rack and power steering pump was replaced at a cost to me of $1728.33 parts/labor. the dealer service representative admitted to me that they had seen such failures before, and that the failure was not a result of my maintainence of this vehicle. in fact, i have vigorously maintained the vehicle with this dealer since its purchase on 6/30/97 - and they have performed all scheduled minor and major services. yet, since i was just outside of the 5 year/50k mile warranty, the dealer refused to cover any of the labor/parts charges for the replacement. i then contacted damiler chrylser's customer service center on this matter. daimler chrysler confirmed that there were no vehicle recalls for rack/pump failures, and held no responsibility. they were uninterested in any discussion of defects, or risk if the failures occurred at highway speeds. if my failure had occurred under those circumstances, rather than on a residential street, there would have been injuries or fatalities since there was no ability to turn or control the steering of the vehicle. chrysler may not be interested in customer satisfaction, but i would have hoped that they would have some concern for such dangerous failures. dt