| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 002211022 | Incident Date: Apr, 04 2002 |
| Consumer's City: SAN FRANCISCO | Consumer's State: CA |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: Toyota Motor Corporation |
| Model Name: CAMRY | Model Year: 1999 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Suspension:front |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: 4T1BG22K3XU | Date added to File: May, 25 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Apr, 21 2003 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Jan, 03 1999 |
| Was Original Owner: Yes | Anti-lock Brakes: No |
| Number of Cylinders: 4 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: It appears that a good portion of camry and solara (both cars share same platform) owners are experiencing a clunking noise that occurs in the front. what does it take for nhtsa to extend the power of consumers to get toyota to admit to its fault, and take full responsibility? tsb#: su00299 tsb#: 012199 tsb#: su00100 given that the massive amount of 1997-2001 camry's sold, i am confident that there are many frustrated owners who wish to have this problem resolved at the expense of toyota motor sales. some owners have experienced the problem early, within the 3yr/36k mi. warranty period, while others are left in the cold to pay about $300 to pay for the repairs. considering that this is a manufacturers defect and not primarily wear and tear, i believe toyota motors corporation has the obligation to extend its warranty to address this issue. under what circumstances can the nhtsa do to protect consumers against design flaws and defects such as this one? *nlm |
