Consumer Complaint Detail

CHEVROLET / BLAZER / 2003

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 003221913 Incident Date: May, 30 2003
Consumer's City: ORANGE Consumer's State: CA
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC
Model Name: BLAZER Model Year: 2003
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Fuel system, other
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 1GNCS18W8YK Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Jun, 30 2003 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: Oct, 19 2001
Was Original Owner: No Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 4 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: As the owner of a 2000 chevrolet blazer, coup (vin: [xxx]) i was looking forward to continue purchasing chevrolet vehicles in the future. however, a recent experience has made me hesitant in this regard. *ak when i recently noticed that my gas gauge was giving questionable readings and i had no idea as to the amount of fuel still remaining in the tank i took the vehicle to the mechanics at selman chevrolet in orange. it was, indeed, determined that the fuel gauge sensor was not functioning correctly, but much to my chagrin i learned that it is not covered under warranty. this includes the extended warranty that i purchased from glendale nissan (member # [xxx]) obviously i was surprised that an item so vital to safety is not covered. i can understand if it were an item requiring replacement after so many miles, but that is obviously not the case. i drive in heavy freeway traffic every day, many times with my 4 year-old daughter, and should i run out of gas the results would be disastrous if not deadly. in such a case who would be responsible if the vehicle ran out of gas due to a faulty reading of the gauge? are you aware that this item malfunctions and if so should it not be considered as a cause for recall or at the very least replaced at no cost to the customer? i have a number of concerns, one of which is whether or not you authorize the sale of a warranty (i purchased this as a pre-owned vehicle with approximately 25,000 miles on it from a reputable dealer) on your vehicle that has such limited coverage as the one that i purchased? also if i were to have purchased this vehicle new, would this item still be covered under the original warranty? information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr