Consumer Complaint Detail

OLDSMOBILE / 88 / 1998

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 003258784 Incident Date: Jul, 06 2003
Consumer's City: CLEVELAND Consumer's State: OH
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC
Model Name: 88 Model Year: 1998
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Engine and engine cooling:engine:gasoline:belts and associated pulleys
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 1G3HN52K9W4 Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Feb, 09 2004 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: May, 21 1998
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 8 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: In early 1998, i purchased a 1998 oldsmobile eighty-eight brand new from reliable oldsmobile dealership in cleveland, oh. although the car is a few years old, the problem i am complaining about began around may 1998. i went to the dealership on numerous occasions complaining about excessive, loud noises that were coming from the engine. the first time i went was june 1, 1998. each time the dealership tried fixing or doing something different, but they never fixed the problem. i endured the noise and the problem because i did not know of anything else to do. while traveling from georgia to ohio last summer (2003), the car finally broke down. the dealership in tennessee determined that the problem was a defective tension pulley. this defective pulley also caused an extensive amount of residural damage to the engine. this was the noise i was hearing . when i contacted the general motors company (the oldsmobile division has shut down), they ignored me except for telling me that my warranty had expired. i recognize that it has expired. however, the problem arose long before the warranty expired and could have been fixed long before it expired but for the oldsmobile dealership's failure to properly diagnose the problem. i do not think it is fair that a dealership can fail (deliberately or not) to diagnose a problem covered by the warranty while the warranty is in effect and then scream that the warranty has expired. particularly, after one of its own dealership diagnosed the problem. if the dealership in tennessee could diagnose it, then the one in ohio should have been able to do so as well. i wish to be reimbursed for the cost of this repair, which was $1944.67. i am not asking for the cost of the hotel room and the wages i missed, but it should have to pay for that as well. *ak