Consumer Complaint Detail
FORD / MUSTANG GT / 1998
0 Injured
0 Death
No Fire
| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 004272468 | Incident Date: Apr, 20 2004 |
| Consumer's City: COLTON | Consumer's State: CA |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: Ford Motor Company |
| Model Name: MUSTANG GT | Model Year: 1998 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Engine and engine cooling:engine |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: | Date added to File: May, 25 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Apr, 25 2004 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: - |
| Was Original Owner: No | Anti-lock Brakes: Yes |
| Number of Cylinders: 8 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: A used vehicle ('98 mustang gt) was financed from a used car dealership by my daughter approx. 3 weeks ago. the salesman who closed the deal stated that the only items to be covered under any kind of warranty would be those regarded as safety items. engine failure or cosmetic features would not be covered. approx. 17 days after financing the vehicle, the rear sway bar broke while she was driving it. the car was immediately returned to the dealership to determine the problem where it sat without notification for another 2 or 3 days. we were informed by a representative (i'm not sure if it was the owner or the manager, due to the fact that out of the 4 or 5 people i spoke to, no one would claim management authority) that the part does not qualify as a safety item which means my daughter would be responsible for the entire cost of the part and the labor. the sway bar was removed by the dealership mechanic and i currently have it in my possession. there are definite signs that the part was cracked and ready to break long before the purchase was made. i attempted to work with the manager and/or the owner to get some resolution. i had offered to replace the part myself if they would be willing to simply purchase it. the manager said the only thing he would be willing to do is cover half the cost of parts and labor ($150). i feel that this part should be covered under the safety clause that the salesman originally told my daughter would be in effect. the cost of the part and labor doesn't bother me nearly as much as the fact that they are not willing to stand behind the vehicles they sell. therefore, i am requesting that a complaint be filed against baja motors due to the fact that they insist a full safety inspection was performed on this vehicle, but that they refuse to stand behind a safety item which was clearly damaged prior to my daughter taking delivery. sincerely, [xxx]. *ak information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). *tr |