Consumer Complaint Detail

DODGE / DAKOTA / 1997

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 004312491 Incident Date: Oct, 24 2004
Consumer's City: CATTARAUGUS Consumer's State: NY
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO Manufacturers Name: Chrysler (FCA US, LLC)
Model Name: DAKOTA Model Year: 1997
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Suspension:front:control arm:upper ball joint
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 1B7GG26XXVS Date added to File: May, 25 2021
Date Complaint Received: Dec, 09 2004 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: Dec, 29 2001
Was Original Owner: No Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 6 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: Going down the road at 55 mph and all of a sudden i hit a pothole and the passenger side tire came right off , it is the same problem as the 2000 - 2003's have. we have pictures of it to prove it . the upper and lower ball joints let loose the cv shaft pulled out and the shock got bent. the tire turned on its side while the truck was sliding down the road sideways and i was unable to control how the truck was going. the only thing holding the tire on the truck was the brake line. the tire rim had chunks taken out of it and the tire had wear from being on its side under the frame of the truck while it was sliding. we had to get it flatbedded to the repair shop . we had a certified repair shop do all the necessary repairs to the truck to which included new upper and lower ball joints,new cv shaft, new rim adn tire , new shock , axle assembly,brake hose , steering gear and linkage,inner and outer tie rods and a front end alignment.this truck had just been through a nys inspection in december 2003 and passed. this accident happened on october 25, 2004 which left us without this vehicle because it was not able to be repaired immediately we got the truck back on november 10 , 2004. we feel that chrysler should be responsible for the repair bill for this vehicle because they are admitting there is a problem the same as this to the newer models. *ak