Consumer Complaint Detail

CHEVROLET / AVALANCHE / 2002

Recalls
0 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 006053382 Incident Date: Jan, 18 2006
Consumer's City: ROWLETT Consumer's State: TX
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC
Model Name: AVALANCHE Model Year: 2002
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Engine and engine cooling:engine
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 0
Vehicle's VIN#: 3GNGK23GX2G Date added to File: May, 23 2021
Date Complaint Received: Jan, 19 2006 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: Feb, 14 2002
Was Original Owner: Yes Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 8 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: I submitted a complaint last night (10148159) after finding the defective part to my vehicle. i searched the nhtsa sight and found many complaints with the same issue, though the person making the complaint did not know the resolution to the issue. i'm thinking the defective part that should be issued a recall for is going un-noticed by the nhtsa because the person making the complaint doesn't know how to resolve and correctly describe it. because of this the nhtsa may overlook that this is the same issue. the following link will take you to the chevy avalanche fan club forum where the issue is described and discussed. http://www.chevyavalanchefanclub.com/cafcna/index.php/topic,39437.0.html many of the forum members are being told by chevy dealers that the issue is with the fuel pump, which is in most cases incorrect. this is causing the consumer to pay to $1000.00 for parts and repairs that are not needed. the cost for repair of the crank shaft position sensor is $110.00 for parts and $170.00 for labor, and this resolves the problem. please have the investigator take a look at the website given above for more information about this issue. this is obviously a defective part that if under the right conditions can cause a major accident and possible loss of life. with total loss of engine power on a 6,600lbs truck i found it almost impossible to turn and very difficult to stop. chevy has also re-designed the part proving evidence that the original design was/is defective. i see this as a more potentially dangerous issue than the tail gate strap recall and at least as equal or higher of an issue as the anti-lock brake defect which the nhtsa has issued recalls for. *jb