Consumer Complaint Detail
GMC / DOOR LATCH / 9999
0 Injured
0 Death
No Fire
| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 006057894 | Incident Date: Feb, 17 2006 |
| Consumer's City: RIVERSIDE | Consumer's State: CA |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC |
| Model Name: DOOR LATCH | Model Year: 9999 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:disc:rotor |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: 2G1FP22K812 | Date added to File: May, 23 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Mar, 02 2006 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Sep, 18 2001 |
| Was Original Owner: Yes | Anti-lock Brakes: Yes |
| Number of Cylinders: 6 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: My 2001 camaro with less than 37k miles was taken to the dealership for new brakes. no reason i took car to dealership other than i wanted new brakes though nothing squeaked & i had no trouble. i did not expect to be told i needed new rotors as the dealership informed me the current rotors were too thin and i needed to replace them as well as the pads and brake linings. i was stunned as the car is hardly driven but a mere 8 miles round trip to work & back the last two years. i would have thought the other california dealership car was taken too just 7 months prior for brake inspection at 33,713 would have advised of impending issue? in reviewing the brake inspection paperwork dated 7/24/05 i clearly noticed the techs lack of attention to even filling in the proper boxes ie: brake linings. the $1100 spent to fix problem is not an issue. its the safety issue! love the car & have had 3 (95,97 & 2001) but am leary to drive it with what appears to be an engineering problem with rotor/pads and gm is ignoring it? ford ignored their problems with tires for years and how many people died? *nm |