Consumer Complaint Detail

MITSUBISHI / MONTERO SPORT / 2001

Recalls
2 Injured
Investigations
0 Death
Complaints
No Fire
Components - Details
NHTSA Complaint Number: 006061560 Incident Date: Mar, 29 2006
Consumer's City: NORTH PROVIDENCE Consumer's State: RI
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO Manufacturers Name: Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Model Name: MONTERO SPORT Model Year: 2001
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No Component's Description: Fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assembly
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No Persons Injured: 2
Vehicle's VIN#: JA4MT21H71P Date added to File: May, 23 2021
Date Complaint Received: Apr, 04 2006 Complaint Type: IVOQ
Incident Reported To Police: No Purchase Date: May, 14 2005
Was Original Owner: No Anti-lock Brakes: Yes
Number of Cylinders: 6 Date of Manufacturer: -
Was Vehicle Towed: - Description of the Complaints: in jan. my wife started to get a whiff of gasoline every now and then when she got out of her 2001 montero sport. it was not enough to arouse suspicion. in the week of 3/27/06, the smell became severe. i found gas running down the gas tank, dripping onto a hose running below it, and to the ground. i brought the vehicle to be repaired at vachon mitsubishi on thurs., 3/30/06. i was contacted by vachon and told that the tank was rotted at the seam and would need to be replaced. i asked if this would be under warranty as the car was only 5 years old and had 44,000 mi. vachon informed me that it would not be under warranty. the repair would cost $1083. i called mitsubishi to question the warranty as i have never heard of a gas tank wearing out so quickly. they informed me that it might be covered under the 7 year/100,000 mile corrosion warranty. i contacted vachon and had them look into it. it was discussed with regional management and they decided that it would not be covered, it would be part of the expired emissions warranty. i again called cust. service. i told them that this failure was too far out of sorts to be out of warranty. gas tanks last 20 to 40 years and this decision should be reconsidered. i was told that it would be reviewed. i was again refused. i asked that a higher level of management review the case. i was told that it would be done and someone would get back to me. 5 days later, i called back because nobody called me. i was told that the case was reviewed again and again they decided against me. my case never got to a higher level of management, it was decided by mr. tessmer, the regional parts and service manager every time. i asked if i could speak to mr. tessmer. the answer was no. at this point the car is fixed. it will cost me $1100.06 to pick it up, more than the price quote. my wife and 7 year old had been complaining of frequent headaches. the headaches have subsided since they stopped using the car. *nm