Consumer Complaint Detail
GENERAL / GRABBER AW / 9999

0 Injured

0 Death

No Fire
Components - Details | |
---|---|
NHTSA Complaint Number: 006065634 | Incident Date: May, 17 2006 |
Consumer's City: SAN ANTONIO | Consumer's State: TX |
Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER CO. |
Model Name: GRABBER AW | Model Year: 9999 |
Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Tires:tread/belt |
Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
Vehicle's VIN#: 1FMRU17L3YL | Date added to File: May, 23 2021 |
Date Complaint Received: May, 17 2006 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Oct, 06 2000 |
Was Original Owner: Yes | Anti-lock Brakes: Yes |
Number of Cylinders: 8 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: Own a 2000 ford expedition (original owner) and had tires replaced as part of recall of 2002. tires were replaced at local ford dealership with general grabber aw p275/60/r17. recently i noticed "steering" and "bumpy" ride, so i took vehicle to get it checked out. mechanic showed how one tire had "bowed out" feature and explained that this was a "tread separation" and needed to be replaced. remembering prior recall for same reason, was concerned this was a possible manufacturer defect. researched on internet and found # to call at continental to report. called and spoke with "bill" who recorded my concerns and created a file #22239. told me a could go to national tire and battery and have it checked out. went to ntb and the technician examined the tire and said he could not prorate the warranty. i explained that i just wanted to inform the manufacturer of the possibility of a manufacturer defect in case there were other complaints for the same type of tire. he said that with the apparent age of the tire it could have been caused by a bump that had caused the weakness. my expectations for a tire is for the tread to wear out before any other breakdown. *nm |