Consumer Complaint Detail
CHEVROLET / TRAILBLAZER EXT / 2003
0 Injured
0 Death
No Fire
| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 007095042 | Incident Date: Jan, 30 2007 |
| Consumer's City: WESTON | Consumer's State: WI |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: AUTO | Manufacturers Name: General Motors, LLC |
| Model Name: TRAILBLAZER EXT | Model Year: 2003 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Fuel system, gasoline:storage |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: 1GNET16S736 | Date added to File: May, 23 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: Feb, 11 2007 | Complaint Type: IVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Aug, 14 2005 |
| Was Original Owner: No | Anti-lock Brakes: Yes |
| Number of Cylinders: 6 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: Since july 2006, mileage 49,000, we have had our check engine light come on many times for the same code. after many trips to the garage, and many things replaced, on jan 31, 2007, mileage 55,802, the dealer told us that i should not drive it home as it could be a fire hazard as there were cracks all over the top part of the gas tank by the filler hose. a new tank was put on and cost came to $832.74. i spoke with customer service at gm and they said gm would do nothing for reimbursement. since then, i have seen many vehicles posted on the web that have had to have there tanks replaced. if this is a safety concern and fire hazard, why is this not becoming a recall, and why is gm not being held responsible for any of this? i don't think a vehicle with 49,000 miles on should have to have a tank replaced. thanks for your time. *jb |