| Components - Details | |
|---|---|
| NHTSA Complaint Number: 007105895 | Incident Date: Apr, 20 2007 |
| Consumer's City: ATLANTIC | Consumer's State: IA |
| Vehicle Transmission Type: MAN | Manufacturers Name: Suzuki Motor USA, LLC |
| Model Name: VZR1800 | Model Year: 2006 |
| Vehicle Involved in a Crash: No | Component's Description: Fuel system, gasoline:delivery |
| Vehicle Involved in a Fire: No | Persons Injured: 0 |
| Vehicle's VIN#: JS1VY53A662 | Date added to File: May, 23 2021 |
| Date Complaint Received: May, 14 2007 | Complaint Type: EVOQ |
| Incident Reported To Police: No | Purchase Date: Apr, 20 2007 |
| Was Original Owner: Yes | Anti-lock Brakes: No |
| Number of Cylinders: 2 | Date of Manufacturer: - |
| Was Vehicle Towed: - | Description of the Complaints: Tl*the contact owns a 2006 suzuki vzr1800k6 m109r. the contact was told that there was a recall on the vehicle that was remedied before it was purchased. he took the vehicle home and then brought it back to the dealer stating that it was experiencing a fuel leak, which could cause a fire. the dealer stated that in order to repair the failure or acquire the parts, it would cost $300. the contact stated that he just paid them $12,000 for the vehicle three days ago. when he arrived home, the contact received a notice in the mail from suzuki informing him of the recall. he called suzuki and informed them of the failure. the contact went back and forth with the dealer on who would repair the failure. the current mileage is 500 and failure mileage was 489. the consumer stated went to purchase a m109r at full throttle motorsports, the consumer asked about the bike that was looked at a week prior, the dealer stated it was on the other side of the showroom stating the bike had been recalled. the consumer and dealer started to discuss pricing. the consumer asked the dealer several times about the recall being performed on the bike because the consumer needed to travel 45 miles home the dealer stated yes all recalls were performed on bike several times. the consumer and dealer put an aftermarket exhaust on the bike and were adding it to the deal. the consumer did not have license to purchase vehicle, the dealer let the consumer take the bike without any driver's license information. the consumer stated was very unhappy about the unpleasant experience and would like assistance with this matter. updated 07/06/07 *tr |
